Bulk Vinegar For Food

Gunthert Mr. and Dr. Dutra, Jacques Bienvenu

Mr. Gunthert just spoke recently on the photograph of Aden and I take this Early news Rimbaud to intervene in this discussion. Once again we are still talking about the inexplicable mistake of dating Mr. Gunther made regarding the date of onset of the process by the gelatin silver bromide. Mr. Gunthert having said that the decade 1880-1890 was "very precisely cut in half "by the introduction of new technology, the gelatin-silver bromide or dry plate. Inexplicable as it is at odds with the thesis that even the author to put online and which states that "From 1879, the process in gelatin silver bromide is experiencing a rapid expansion of its distribution in France, first with amateur photographers, especially in the regions, but also professional ... "Nevertheless, Mr. Gunthert challenges the references I have data that indicate that the process was popularized in 1879. So in conclusion, I hope with this issue, I posted two pages of the bulletin of the French Society of Photography in September 1879 which proves beyond doubt that the process is completely popularized at that time just read. I would add that the likelihood of a traveler or explorer in Aden, knowing this process is even bigger than this city was under British rule and the gelatin-bromide was initially rependu England. Moreover, the presence of two certified professional photographers attending the Hall the universe makes the assumption Revoil even more hypothetical.

Dutrieux / Photography Thierry Selva / DR

Mr. Gunthert remains one of the most ardent defenders of the presence of Rimbaud. He is also full of finesse, leaving the heavy artillery to others. Thus, Mr. Gunthert has understood that denying the likeness of the bearded Dutra left was useless. However, we see immediately bring obstacles that seem totally insurmountable. Thus, initially, he stressed no documents proving the absence of Dutra in Aden in August. However, always very objective, Mr. Gunthert agrees with my analysis of the letter and said Dutra very convincing and therefore can not be Dutrieux in Aden in August. But now stands suddenly another hurdle posed by Mr. Gunthert: And if that was not Dutrieux the picture? (Observe that Mr. Gunthert never arises the same question regarding the pseudo-photograph of Rimbaud). It's all very clear that the man who gave the photograph to the Geographical Society of Paris knew Dutra, which is an essential point (they were both member and general secretary respectively of the Geographical Society of Cairo), this does not suffice as proof. So we absolutely need another picture to prove it's good Dutra. Mr. Gunthert knows that it is very difficult to find another picture, and he certainly think there have been a good barrier for a long time. So I'm not exactly a picture but a sculpture show.

Tomb Dutrieux Tournai / Photography Thierry Selva / All rights reserved

The sculpture looks like the photograph that we know. So you may be entitled to assume that those who erected this monument would not have chosen a picture that does not look like him. The photograph would have few reasons to be authentic.

I also states that there is in the Library of Brussels a lithograph Dutrieux modeled exactly the picture of the Geographical Society but I do not have permission to publish it.

Mr. Gunthert wrote recently:

"The problem is actually over the timetable of Dutra. I have written in my last post commentary: analysis of Welcome on the letter of February 18, 1881 seems to think quite convincingly. Remains to verify that the person on the photo of the Geographical Society is Dutrieux (we have already seen cases of misattribution, and identification is not based so far on a single picture). Once we have confirmation that there will be no serious reason to support the hypothesis Rimbaud. "

Mr. Gunthert will rank there again my reasons? Will he consider there is more reasonable basis to support the hypothesis Rimbaud? It is doubtful.