Saturday, June 5, 2010

How Much Formula Does Wic Give You Wa

Gunzig or ready-to-think


In recent weeks I have, so to speak, not practiced my creative activities, but the clouds continued to cross my horizon. This cloud is well-gray.

I'm allergic to Thomas Gunzig. His notes on the first morning ("espresso") I was saturated. The tolerance threshold is reached. "Fuckers" committed yesterday morning irritates me all over my body.

"fuckers" (read the blog the author) is a repetitive litany consists of hackneyed images. Gunzig not carrying out the clear line, he practices the big gulp. Poor RTBF.

But for m'insupporter Gunzig says so? The Belgian people are a kind and wise, who likes things simple and wants to live in peace. Policies are incapable, incompetent and create problems where "people" do not. So let's strike.

I am appalled by the prevailing discourse of which this ticket is just one illustration.

Beatrice Delvaux, editor of Le Soir and other champions of ready-to-believe right-thinking, said in its editorial the past weekend, the vast majority of opinion leaders Flemish surveyed are in favor of dialogue and coexistence between the two communities and that they, at least, would make good leaders, the policies would do well to emulate it. On the one hand, the good society, on the other, politics, bad. On one side, women and men leaders and good will of the other villains, troublemakers. The tour Flemish impressionist Guy Duplat in the Free to a week ago, poured into the same trap.

I really wonder what causes these observers, columnists and journalists, and to simplify the analysis. Is this for convenience? Is it for pleasure or for self-congratulation?

Can they not observe, describe and analyze the reality in its complexity? Try to understand what has brought BHV symbolic and real strong for many Flemish? Trying to convey the diversity and the multiplicity of claims and positions Flemish? Understand that for many, institutional and socio-economic status are related? For some, caring for the welfare "of the people" requires more skills for the regions? Examine the phenomenon of retrenchment and closure of the prosperous regions, whose populations seek to preserve materials acquired for their own benefit? Trying to understand why 800,000 Flemish Leterme voted in 2007 and why a significant proportion De Wever prepares to vote? Understand why the Walloons continue to vote Daerden and Di Rupo? More fundamentally, question, point of view of philosophy and political sociology, the system of democratic representation, its relevance and its flaws, this system which generates precisely those who govern us ...

No, people are not naturally good, society is no pure essence, media neutral. The first elect our leaders and seek daily. Civil society to steer through the action of its sectoral lobbies. The media shape them. The situation in which our country finds itself today is the result of subtle interactions between these different poles, in the context of a changing society. The responsibility is shared.

Personally, I appreciate the writers who surprise me with their innovative lighting, by the unexpected relationships, by their cold eyes and their ability to swim against the tide. They exist, for example at 7:20 am on the First or columns of De Standaard. Common places, be they provocateurs (a provocation agreed) does not interest me, they make me tired.

Thomas Gunzig you finish your ticket by calling a strike. I beg you!

0 comments:

Post a Comment