Serienummer Adobe Aftereffects

Lizin / Eerdekens, more than geographical proximity

Anne-Marie Lizin was well back, Sunday lunch on the sets of RTBF equal to itself. Fortunately, despite the intention of the duo-Maroy Daout (see their statements on the site Sud Presse ), but rather as a facilitator she scored the debate as a contributor. Making people laugh, unintentionally, the gallery ("I will not remind you that I represent over 150,000 voters), then bite his feigned anger, old trick which she continues to use (*). The professor of Islamic religion, measured, trying in vain to finish his argument: Ms. Lizin built its indignation, raised his voice and cut short any dialogue. Authoritarian posture, natural, got the upper hand.

Claude Eerdekens is poured into the same mold. The moralizing rhetoric, he knows. It is often excessive ("the yellow star of the elected") but more it is, at best, thinks he. Of cons-fire intended to divert the attention of local authoritarian practices, far from the generous principles which he regularly makes the bard.

Lizin As it is small eco-friendly "itching powder" responsible for all evils and the attack on all fronts. See, on the effective www.agorati.be his recent contributions. Illuminating: GM, asbestos, bio-fuel, nuclear, pesticides, electromagnetic waves, etc..

This guerilla impulsive cons green will eventually irritate the bulwark of the Emperor. Not that the PS wants Javaux household and his family, but, mate Claude, he would play it more subtle, the Magnette 'ecology, but also us. "

No wonder Mr Eerdekens it takes to particracy. It is more saintly in his party. The slightest misstep, the lower case and will follow the fate of its neighbor Meuse.

(*) Have you noticed that policies directed their anger willingly media against non-political, as did Minister Lutgen, A few weeks ago, on the same plate, facing a European official? It's so easy and paying, but it is so moved!

Damask Wrapping Paper Uk

Son Dad

The "father's son", "Open VLD knows. Walter Pauli Morgen recently developed the following analysis: If the Flemish Liberal Party is struggling to find a worthy successor to Guy Verhofstadt, is partly due to the prominent role the "daughters and son of" Jean-Jacques De Gucht, Mathias De Clercq, Alexandre De Croo, Eva Vanhengel, etc.. Not that these kids are lacking qualities. No, their weakness is that their position is not the end of the classic obstacle course, that ordinary people attracted by the sirens policy is invited to cross, with the help of his own elbows. Without having passed the Para become the steps of the heavy selection. Pauli took the example of the pamphlet of the young De Clercq: voor een nieuw Pleidooi Liberaal offensief . Had it been written by the little son of Willy, the work would have been down in flames. But no, the reviews are caring and the author is now convinced he has contributed remarkable political thought.

The tradition of professional heritage is particularly strong in some quarters is the son Relay dad lawyer, doctor, lawyer or policy. Denying he has a handshake would be intellectually dishonest, but this bonus, sonny will operate with more or less talent. Take, at random, and Charles Michel Denis Ducarme.

is that appreciates over time. Often though, the transmission process takes time: Roger Vanden Stock has remained in the shadow of his father for years and only gradually it has built its legitimacy.

Since Jean Sarkory -23 year old son of the President French-interested in politics (two years), the doors are constantly open to it (soon perhaps those of the Presidency of EPAD, a public management area of Defence in Paris the largest European business district). Who believes sincerely that it would given its talent? In addition the doors open, at the John believes, as Mathias, that good policy and competent, he occupies the place it deserves. As such, John can do nothing. It makes him believe and he believes. He doubted whether it would be really awesome.

Unfortunately, this is not the last speeches of his supporters (mostly supporters of Dad ) that will stimulate critical thinking skills.

Luc Chatel, Spokesman of the French Government and Minister of National Education, spear, irritated, "this case begins to suffice! We really have the feeling of a manhunt. All those involved on this issue, what do they want? They want to prohibit the election of a candidate by his social origin, name, facies? That is the Republic? ". Expression of the minister reveals the complacency vengeful, proud to have returned to their opponents usual formulas. It does not (yet) have measured the ineptitude of his remarks.

worse. Fadela Amara, Secretary of State for Urban Affairs, said that affected by the "judge me on my actions" of little John, said: "this country is afraid of his youth." Ugly diversion slogan.

When we run out of argument, it is no longer in lace.

Free Scary Jack O Lantern Templates

popular views in question

Done uncommon, referendums and consultations popular feed, these days, the news political, local and European. In Switzerland, where consultation is not uncommon, the fifth federal referendum was held late September. The Irish, they come to give a decisive push to the Treaty of Lisbon and Antwerp are preparing to go to the voting booth this Sunday, October 18, for - who knows - a fatal blow to the "Lange Wapperbrug" this mega-project road bridge north of the city.

The referendum is an institution of direct democracy ("the electorate decides, or indicative of a binding on a particular matter") and represents an additional - Not alternative - to representative democracy ("the electoral body shall appoint representatives in the Assemblies"). Its variants are numerous, I will not go into details here. Without ignoring the differences, but for convenience, I will continue speaking indiscriminately of popular consultation and referendum generically.

What is the contribution of the popular consultation to democracy?

I want, above all, the obvious : Democracy is not a body of fixed rules untouchable, cast in an iron law. General principles of representation of the people and the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms constitute the matrix, but beyond that, the political regimes that claim it are many, none can claim democratic excellence. Each system is rooted in its history and its present, it forms a relative equilibrium, determined by its cultural context. Sometimes this notion of relativity of democracy is lost sight of, voluntarily or not. The "what is undemocratic ... "heard here and there tend to irritate me.

In its adaptation to changing context, democracy is experiencing a general trend of rapprochement between politicians and citizens. The distance is up to the vicinity: the Minister mingles with the people he speaks "as people" and sharing their leisure. At the institutional level, efforts are underway to make government more transparent and accessible. New forms of democracy are implemented: conciliation committee, public inquiries, association groups in decision-making process, citizen panels, etc.. Democracy is participatory forms.

This change, inevitable and necessary, represents a step forward.

It tends, however, now clear the fundamental difference in status between each other. The policy is not an ordinary citizen, elected, he wears a project or vision. It is he who must, ultimately , determine how to implement this project, even assuming some kind of unpopularity. The position of a politician is not the sum of the opinions of his constituents - the amount remains impossible. This does not mean it is not important in the decision making process, taking into account the expressions of citizens' positions, but this consideration is a step in the process, not its culmination. The political dialectic is not just the fiction of a unilateral relationship of voters to their representatives that some populist would pretend to be the essence of democracy.

Even so and to return to the subject, it is in light of this tension between "local" and "distance" between "citizen expression" and "political responsibility" that must consider the interests of the popular consultation.

The referendum asks the public debate. It requires policies out of their circles, to explain and disclose their arguments. Their desire to convince him to make proof of education (or grandstanding - but this criticism also applies to the elections). For their part, citizens are stimulated and invited to consider and they participate in the discussion as they would never have done. Rating other experts occupy public space. Technicians must "disseminate."

The richness and strength of the debates knows the city of Antwerp in the final straight before the popular consultation are impressive. The Standaard newspaper reports including daily ( http://bit.ly/1N8zqE ) . Doubtless this consultation she comes a little late, but that is another question.

The French referendum of May 29, 2005, initiated and uncontrolled by Jacques Chirac (plebiscite somewhat failed), gave, too, rise to a profusion of debates, absent in states where the Constitution was ratified by the European Parliament.

Although the referendum is not provided sine qua non of democratic ferment, but it has the virtue of creating or amplifying the inevitable.

The accusations against the referendum, I hear them well: binary debates, diversion of the object, simplifying reduction issues, etc.. Charles Bricman the recently expressed in his blog "We have things to say" ( http://bit.ly/1phYU6 ).

These criticisms are probably well founded, although the example shows in Antwerp, seen from Brussels, that the complexity of things seems well considered. But these criticisms are worth, the same way for general elections. Who votes in perfect knowledge of the facts (ie the party platforms)? Policies not adopt simplistic and caricatured positions during election campaigns ("the liberal crisis" rabies taxatoire "...)? Who voted in the light of European issues in the European elections ? This is not a feature of the popular consultation to address these through.

The referendum enriches democracy. A practice policy to respect the results should probably be put in place, but it does not seem desirable to impose the law. This would deprive the political responsibility. I would consider a weakness of democracy a system which does not grant it the power of the last word.

Do Hiv People Always Have Colds Flu

Bravo Brussels, despite the Whiners!

Cultural Networks Brussels, French (RAB) and Flemish (BKO) come to share their Culture Plan for Brussels: u n all proposals, thoughtful and not "take it or leave it", says it appropriately. The consultation process put in place two years ago in the capital, led today to the plan, which I think is constructive, concrete, and backbone.

Read text and proposals (by clicking the post title). A powerful and mature, reflecting the richness and vividness of networks in Brussels.

What would you want more? Can not welcome?

nicely in his article entitled "Culture has its plan in Brussels", Jean-Marie Wynants's Le Soir newspaper recalls that "some believe that these proposals have an air of Trojan .

We knew this speech and chilly regularly surface. Their paranoid makes it so blind these malcontents? Or is it their nostalgia for a certain culture? They must live very isolated for not having found that the Flemish Brussels institutions have, for the most part, freed from original sin, that their contribution to the Brussels reality has nothing to do with the motive of proselytizing their financial background. The facts are there, in both the cultural and social. Look!

But perhaps it is this discomfort that: a certain independence from the Brussels Flemish political autonomy they have conquered. It should not be their make such spread. Culture in the French do not like it, from Brussels to Chiny.