Red Wine Dark Stool Color

No, Danny, that's not football

Like Cohn-Bendit, his attitude to politics, his vision, his critical review, its nuance, intelligence, etc.. But there! His statements to AFP, taken up by Le Monde and reproduced below, are a concentrated stupidity. He had, in a recent issue, acknowledged that on the football, it could be evidence of bad faith grime. That was an understatement.

Preview World online, Thursday, November 19:

other politicians to intervene, Daniel Cohn-Bendit (Europe-Ecologie) told AFP Thursday that
"the hand of Thierry Henry is the ultimate chance" . Henry "done its job" , "which the referee should have seen the hand" , he said, holding that "it's not cheating, football is like that" . He added. "What terrified me, this is not the hand - it happens, the biggest one is that like Maradona - which is horrible, it's the way the team played in France" .

Reading this excerpt from the World put me beside myself: rage is mingled with disappointment.

In this case, which is serious, this is not error for arbitration, but the attitude of Thierry Henry after his willful misconduct and the guarantee provided by people like Danny or others (including Rama Yade).

a hand behind deliberately, it happens. The referee does not see it, it happens. Is considered normal that the author did not pass moral obligation (fair play) to recognize his fault is staggering. There is some honor in victory. Henry should have been his fault report to the referee, that's all.

Cohn-Bendit said: "He did his job." What the job of a footballer is he cheating? (As if we were to accept the cheating of a member of the Greens, on the grounds that his job is to win his party!). Who decreed that fair play was not necessary in football?

The fault is not with the referee is in athletes cheat.

Calling Maradona is really sad and sounds like an admission of impotence. As if, because others have done ...

It is the degree zero of the argument.

How to fight against cheating in sport, whether professional or amateur, if you (authorities, references) accepts a goal can be based on cheating, let alone when it is emblematic of a player and that the issue is the qualification for the World Cup.

Young Henry who saw last night who have read or heard Cohn-Bendit (and others), will undoubtedly be a little easier to find some compromise with their conscience when they are experiencing.

No, Dany, is not the level of play of your favorite team is horrible (I am surprised that you may think that people are interested in your opinion on the matter) that is horrible, it is commonplace that you do cheating.

I'm still KO

Baby Eczema Treatment Wikipedia

Radio Brussels

On September 17, 2009, while a Belgian-Swiss documentary on the staging of public appearances President Sarkozy made a noise in the cathodic landerneau, RTBF (Radio Brussels) boasted on his website: " kilometer distance and promotes the practice of institutional impartiality! .

The distance therefore promotes fairness. Local TV stations so they are convicted of bias? The exclusion of the policies of their bodies-as envisaged by the French Community and discussed this Monday at 3:55 p.m. on intermediation will she change the situation?

TVs Accusing local bias is excessive and striking for people who are trying to do their job with professionalism, with the limited means at their disposal. But one can not deny that nearby Institutional (serving in elected bodies, from funding to parts of the communes and provinces) and geographical create an unhealthy dependency of the media vis-à-vis a political world that is supposed to cover the distance with journalist required .

The local politician who sits on the board or the Office of the institution receives input and easy access to key people. He knows the house and it is often small. The old practice was customary policy of direct intervention. I believe that these behaviors are more rare, at least more discreet.

But most n is not there. Often the influence is so insidious. What is at stake is access to information. Critical journalists were denied access to sources, because of their independence. " If you're cool with us, we will continue to supply you with information, or en primeur. Otherwise, you will be boycotted! " Things are rarely so explicit, but the context is one. It is also not peculiar to local TVs. The newspaper industry is facing the same phenomenon.

I remember the coverage Télévesdre a visit organized by SPI + at Freiburg. These are local agents of the province of Liege who discover the virtues of political Ecological implemented in the German city. Everyone is appreciative. TV Vesdre gives ample voice to some influential agents: a leader of an important inter, a deputy mayor of a town in the Province, an MLA. Everyone is convinced, while not so long ago, they did not hide their skepticism. Everyone has their own local initiative, exemplary. Both environmentalists provincial councilors who attended the trip, they have no voice. Yet, they believe that a priori would be interesting, would have put into perspective the statements of each other.

This example is symptomatic, in my opinion: there is no question here of bias and there is no fault of the journalist, just a slight omission complacent.

The prohibition against elected to sit in the CA local TVs will not lead to radical change. Elected officials may be replaced by local apparatchiks. There will be less interference on one side, there will be more than another. By itself, no big difference. Moreover, one who knew how to designate by his party as a representative of local TV will certainly be heard from the apparatchik. More fundamentally, as I noted above, the political influence on the journalistic work is mainly carried on another level: that of access to information. Each mayor has this weapon, he registered or not in the CA local TV.

So what? Where to begin?

Among other measures (for example, why does not consider signing by the directors of a local TV's code of conduct?), I tell myself that the exclusion policy is perhaps not so inappropriate that what I originally thought. For teams drafting, the departure of elected will serve a form of empowerment, the feeling of not having permanently behind him, a presence partisan, hope not to be evaluated by judges and political parties.

Symbolic, the measure could be beneficial if it does not remain isolated.

Serienummer Adobe Aftereffects

Lizin / Eerdekens, more than geographical proximity

Anne-Marie Lizin was well back, Sunday lunch on the sets of RTBF equal to itself. Fortunately, despite the intention of the duo-Maroy Daout (see their statements on the site Sud Presse ), but rather as a facilitator she scored the debate as a contributor. Making people laugh, unintentionally, the gallery ("I will not remind you that I represent over 150,000 voters), then bite his feigned anger, old trick which she continues to use (*). The professor of Islamic religion, measured, trying in vain to finish his argument: Ms. Lizin built its indignation, raised his voice and cut short any dialogue. Authoritarian posture, natural, got the upper hand.

Claude Eerdekens is poured into the same mold. The moralizing rhetoric, he knows. It is often excessive ("the yellow star of the elected") but more it is, at best, thinks he. Of cons-fire intended to divert the attention of local authoritarian practices, far from the generous principles which he regularly makes the bard.

Lizin As it is small eco-friendly "itching powder" responsible for all evils and the attack on all fronts. See, on the effective www.agorati.be his recent contributions. Illuminating: GM, asbestos, bio-fuel, nuclear, pesticides, electromagnetic waves, etc..

This guerilla impulsive cons green will eventually irritate the bulwark of the Emperor. Not that the PS wants Javaux household and his family, but, mate Claude, he would play it more subtle, the Magnette 'ecology, but also us. "

No wonder Mr Eerdekens it takes to particracy. It is more saintly in his party. The slightest misstep, the lower case and will follow the fate of its neighbor Meuse.

(*) Have you noticed that policies directed their anger willingly media against non-political, as did Minister Lutgen, A few weeks ago, on the same plate, facing a European official? It's so easy and paying, but it is so moved!

Damask Wrapping Paper Uk

Son Dad

The "father's son", "Open VLD knows. Walter Pauli Morgen recently developed the following analysis: If the Flemish Liberal Party is struggling to find a worthy successor to Guy Verhofstadt, is partly due to the prominent role the "daughters and son of" Jean-Jacques De Gucht, Mathias De Clercq, Alexandre De Croo, Eva Vanhengel, etc.. Not that these kids are lacking qualities. No, their weakness is that their position is not the end of the classic obstacle course, that ordinary people attracted by the sirens policy is invited to cross, with the help of his own elbows. Without having passed the Para become the steps of the heavy selection. Pauli took the example of the pamphlet of the young De Clercq: voor een nieuw Pleidooi Liberaal offensief . Had it been written by the little son of Willy, the work would have been down in flames. But no, the reviews are caring and the author is now convinced he has contributed remarkable political thought.

The tradition of professional heritage is particularly strong in some quarters is the son Relay dad lawyer, doctor, lawyer or policy. Denying he has a handshake would be intellectually dishonest, but this bonus, sonny will operate with more or less talent. Take, at random, and Charles Michel Denis Ducarme.

is that appreciates over time. Often though, the transmission process takes time: Roger Vanden Stock has remained in the shadow of his father for years and only gradually it has built its legitimacy.

Since Jean Sarkory -23 year old son of the President French-interested in politics (two years), the doors are constantly open to it (soon perhaps those of the Presidency of EPAD, a public management area of Defence in Paris the largest European business district). Who believes sincerely that it would given its talent? In addition the doors open, at the John believes, as Mathias, that good policy and competent, he occupies the place it deserves. As such, John can do nothing. It makes him believe and he believes. He doubted whether it would be really awesome.

Unfortunately, this is not the last speeches of his supporters (mostly supporters of Dad ) that will stimulate critical thinking skills.

Luc Chatel, Spokesman of the French Government and Minister of National Education, spear, irritated, "this case begins to suffice! We really have the feeling of a manhunt. All those involved on this issue, what do they want? They want to prohibit the election of a candidate by his social origin, name, facies? That is the Republic? ". Expression of the minister reveals the complacency vengeful, proud to have returned to their opponents usual formulas. It does not (yet) have measured the ineptitude of his remarks.

worse. Fadela Amara, Secretary of State for Urban Affairs, said that affected by the "judge me on my actions" of little John, said: "this country is afraid of his youth." Ugly diversion slogan.

When we run out of argument, it is no longer in lace.

Free Scary Jack O Lantern Templates

popular views in question

Done uncommon, referendums and consultations popular feed, these days, the news political, local and European. In Switzerland, where consultation is not uncommon, the fifth federal referendum was held late September. The Irish, they come to give a decisive push to the Treaty of Lisbon and Antwerp are preparing to go to the voting booth this Sunday, October 18, for - who knows - a fatal blow to the "Lange Wapperbrug" this mega-project road bridge north of the city.

The referendum is an institution of direct democracy ("the electorate decides, or indicative of a binding on a particular matter") and represents an additional - Not alternative - to representative democracy ("the electoral body shall appoint representatives in the Assemblies"). Its variants are numerous, I will not go into details here. Without ignoring the differences, but for convenience, I will continue speaking indiscriminately of popular consultation and referendum generically.

What is the contribution of the popular consultation to democracy?

I want, above all, the obvious : Democracy is not a body of fixed rules untouchable, cast in an iron law. General principles of representation of the people and the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms constitute the matrix, but beyond that, the political regimes that claim it are many, none can claim democratic excellence. Each system is rooted in its history and its present, it forms a relative equilibrium, determined by its cultural context. Sometimes this notion of relativity of democracy is lost sight of, voluntarily or not. The "what is undemocratic ... "heard here and there tend to irritate me.

In its adaptation to changing context, democracy is experiencing a general trend of rapprochement between politicians and citizens. The distance is up to the vicinity: the Minister mingles with the people he speaks "as people" and sharing their leisure. At the institutional level, efforts are underway to make government more transparent and accessible. New forms of democracy are implemented: conciliation committee, public inquiries, association groups in decision-making process, citizen panels, etc.. Democracy is participatory forms.

This change, inevitable and necessary, represents a step forward.

It tends, however, now clear the fundamental difference in status between each other. The policy is not an ordinary citizen, elected, he wears a project or vision. It is he who must, ultimately , determine how to implement this project, even assuming some kind of unpopularity. The position of a politician is not the sum of the opinions of his constituents - the amount remains impossible. This does not mean it is not important in the decision making process, taking into account the expressions of citizens' positions, but this consideration is a step in the process, not its culmination. The political dialectic is not just the fiction of a unilateral relationship of voters to their representatives that some populist would pretend to be the essence of democracy.

Even so and to return to the subject, it is in light of this tension between "local" and "distance" between "citizen expression" and "political responsibility" that must consider the interests of the popular consultation.

The referendum asks the public debate. It requires policies out of their circles, to explain and disclose their arguments. Their desire to convince him to make proof of education (or grandstanding - but this criticism also applies to the elections). For their part, citizens are stimulated and invited to consider and they participate in the discussion as they would never have done. Rating other experts occupy public space. Technicians must "disseminate."

The richness and strength of the debates knows the city of Antwerp in the final straight before the popular consultation are impressive. The Standaard newspaper reports including daily ( http://bit.ly/1N8zqE ) . Doubtless this consultation she comes a little late, but that is another question.

The French referendum of May 29, 2005, initiated and uncontrolled by Jacques Chirac (plebiscite somewhat failed), gave, too, rise to a profusion of debates, absent in states where the Constitution was ratified by the European Parliament.

Although the referendum is not provided sine qua non of democratic ferment, but it has the virtue of creating or amplifying the inevitable.

The accusations against the referendum, I hear them well: binary debates, diversion of the object, simplifying reduction issues, etc.. Charles Bricman the recently expressed in his blog "We have things to say" ( http://bit.ly/1phYU6 ).

These criticisms are probably well founded, although the example shows in Antwerp, seen from Brussels, that the complexity of things seems well considered. But these criticisms are worth, the same way for general elections. Who votes in perfect knowledge of the facts (ie the party platforms)? Policies not adopt simplistic and caricatured positions during election campaigns ("the liberal crisis" rabies taxatoire "...)? Who voted in the light of European issues in the European elections ? This is not a feature of the popular consultation to address these through.

The referendum enriches democracy. A practice policy to respect the results should probably be put in place, but it does not seem desirable to impose the law. This would deprive the political responsibility. I would consider a weakness of democracy a system which does not grant it the power of the last word.

Do Hiv People Always Have Colds Flu

Bravo Brussels, despite the Whiners!

Cultural Networks Brussels, French (RAB) and Flemish (BKO) come to share their Culture Plan for Brussels: u n all proposals, thoughtful and not "take it or leave it", says it appropriately. The consultation process put in place two years ago in the capital, led today to the plan, which I think is constructive, concrete, and backbone.

Read text and proposals (by clicking the post title). A powerful and mature, reflecting the richness and vividness of networks in Brussels.

What would you want more? Can not welcome?

nicely in his article entitled "Culture has its plan in Brussels", Jean-Marie Wynants's Le Soir newspaper recalls that "some believe that these proposals have an air of Trojan .

We knew this speech and chilly regularly surface. Their paranoid makes it so blind these malcontents? Or is it their nostalgia for a certain culture? They must live very isolated for not having found that the Flemish Brussels institutions have, for the most part, freed from original sin, that their contribution to the Brussels reality has nothing to do with the motive of proselytizing their financial background. The facts are there, in both the cultural and social. Look!

But perhaps it is this discomfort that: a certain independence from the Brussels Flemish political autonomy they have conquered. It should not be their make such spread. Culture in the French do not like it, from Brussels to Chiny.

Deborah Sampson Accomplishments

Danes happy together

On 14 September, Joseph Stiglitz presented "Report on the measurement of economic performance and social progress" to his partner, Nicolas Sarkozy. Objective of the exercise (for the G20 of Pittsburgh): enabling nations and international organizations to take greater account of human and social dimensions in the assessment of economies. Very good. A bit silly, when Similarly, from the French president bling bling.

therefore Focus on humans. Focus on, as Justin would say, "true values". This time, recent academic studies, ranking countries according to their degree of happiness of their people were taken out of drawers. World Magazine leaned way, September 19th, the Danish world champions of happiness.

First observation: there are well-is it a surprise? - A correlation between material well-being and happiness. The four countries with the most people happy, Denmark, Switzerland, Austria and Iceland-have thriving economies (for Iceland, things are a bit spoiled since) and are respectively 9 ^th , 6 ^th , 20 ^th and 10 ^th ranking GNP / capita.

But the correlation Wealth / Happiness is not perfect. Bahamians, the Bhutanese and the Costa Ricans, ranked 5 ^th , 8 ^th and 13 ^th in the hit parade of happiness, seem not to "live evil" their relative poverty. Conversely, the strongest economies do not necessarily reflect the conditions of happiness: see Germany, France and Japan, ranked 90 ^th .

A multiplicity of factors explain the gap in a report, no doubt, very complex. One of these factors is particularly highlighted by Laurent Carpentier's World : social cohesion, the feeling, more or less strong, belonging to the nation. Amusing to note in this regard that all countries experiencing high ratting happiness kind of isolation: islands or peninsulas, a country nestled in the mountains, isolated countries institutionally.

The Danes therefore the happiest: strong welfare state and economy, security and respect, esteem, and most importantly, the fact of living among compatriots. The thesis of this couple listened, former minister and influential columnist, is explicit: "The happy Danes, a cohesion issue." Cohesion valuable fortunately preserved by a massive reduction of immigration flows, which became unbearable during the 90s (sic). It feels good because it is between us, we share the same values (resic). Henrik Dahl, a sociologist more critical, saying the same thing in reverse: "I'm afraid it's the old version-that of mechanical solidarity that is not beyond the realm of similar people-which prevails here. The Danes are a tribe. "

Denmark, Switzerland, Austria ... with their own cities and pretty, their green building advanced security into their streets, their efficient public transport, ... right-thinking societies, where difference is tolerated tip lips; countries said nationalism where good electoral results of populist and extreme right reflect a tendency to isolationism.

People so happy.

Disturbing.

Etiquette Congratulate Baby

Javaux not Jannin

I hate when politicians take stage, simply because I do not like politics show.

Jean-Michel Javaux, the charismatic co-president of Ecolo, just posted a video simulating a kidnapping. He does know, on Facebook and Twitter: A teaser for the benefit of a rock band friend, a wink, to take the tenth degree, no doubt. The problem the fact is that, as shown by misadventure Hortefeux, only counts the first degree.

Any removal is traumatic for the victim, his relatives, witnesses. I read this was the story of Clara Rojas, former inmate of the FARC. This weekend, De Morgen recounted sequestration by Taliban by Stephen Farrell, a journalist from NYT. Similar situations, less spectacular, less dramatic, occur every day and cause the same type of suffering.

Simulate "to laugh", hostage taking, gives an impression of lightness, lack of empathy. And from a policy, it's embarrassing.

Some may laugh at everything (Jannin, Kroll, ...) it is accepted because they represent only themselves. Then, casually, they respect the limits they set themselves.

Jean-Michel Javaux represents its voters his commune, more broadly, with colleagues chairmen of other political parties, the French electorate as a whole. What views and positions are decided is not a problem. By cons, his "doings" must be consensual, not offend any sensibility, precisely because it seeks to cover everyone.

Eric Fottorino, director of the World concluded his editorial this weekend in these terms: "Brice Hortefeux has forgotten that a minister must represent at each instant the values of the Republic. And measuring each word that may contain disrespect, violence and humiliation. " Relatively speaking, the board seems relevant here too.

can be in politics, with a certain detachment and a certain humor. See our first (now, not the last!). Not necessary to do so-and undesirable-indeed stepping on the policy stage show.

Stylist Blogger Templates

Another street is possible, Mr. Speaker.

In recent weeks, residents and pedestrians from the street from Flanders to Brussels found Jeroen Peters, squatter's No. 100. The opinions posted on the window of the building of the eighteenth century Property neglected by CPAS for ten years, telling his story. The video "The delicate balance" posted on www.vimeo.com can find out more.

Initially an occupation "without right or title" but by dint of hard work and investment, Peters opened an original space, "T'Evenwicht / The Balance" , art gallery like no other meeting place open to neighbors and the needy. Some artists display; homeless live there. Openings and social meal after another.

But now, "T'Evenwicht / The Balance" is not in the plans of the CPAS, whose president Yvan Mayeur (PS), announced that the squatter and his guests should vacate to make way for a commercial ground floor and housing, after a demolition / reconstruction. An expulsion decision is rendered. The district takes action in favor of maintaining the balance.

is where we are today.

My question: a dynamic and flexible administration is possible?

The institutional logic would like this: democratic bodies anticipate and plan, individual decisions arising from this general framework as is needed, no question of departing from it. Exit therefore Jeroen.

A teleological approach - which focuses on the purpose-consider the issue from another angle. We know that the best social symbioses are of spontaneous origin. The best urban planners and sociologists have good planning and harmonious social mix, their plans are not enough. Put more simply: how planners do not dream of seeing emerge in their ideal city art gallery with a social, open to its urban environment? The kind of companies that can not be decreed, that social workers can not invent, but which arise from a competition happy circumstances, a magical personality, history, motivation, strength and meeting with a place, at one point.

course, the project is outside the conventional patterns and administrative evaluation of its social contribution is not something easy (it can also be said for conventional initiatives). But again, the public interest must also be able to gauge outside the usual measuring instruments.

My purpose here is not to say "Jeroen must remain" but to ask the question: Is the CPAS can actually measure the contribution to the city and its inhabitants spontaneous social that place? Can he, on the basis of this assessment, differ-if-track purely administrative leaving the initiative to deploy and inventing a framing device appropriate? The question is obviously more general public management dynamic is possible? Are the authorities able to make room for voluntary initiatives, adding value to society, when they emerge?

Yvan Mayeur, president of the CPAS and Socialist member of Parliament, recently took over its account, with Jean Cornil, the slogan "another world is possible", he added later: "We must dare to challenge production patterns that threaten the quality of life. "

could start here and now, simply.